The low rate of certification also raises concerns about the scarcity of licensing and lax oversight of dog trainers in the USA leading to potential safety risks for both owners and dogs.Ībstract = "Dog trainers word choice may provide information about how a trainer understands and relates to the dogs they work with. This shows that there is a wide variability in word use by dog trainers, which leads to inconsistencies in information provided to the public. ![]() Positive reinforcement trainers were also significantly more likely to be certified than balanced trainers ((Formula presented.) = 18.75, p < 0.01). We found women practiced positive reinforcement training significantly more often than men ((Formula presented.) = 12.79, p < 0.05). For example, aversive trainers referred to corrective collars as “electronic collars” and explained their use non-aversive trainers called the same tool a “shock collar” and stated that it was never used in their training. Some codes differentiated between training methodologies, particularly those related to training-tool use. Specific words or phrases that were selected based on their importance within training were turned into 20 codes that were examined for their context and frequency of use across the 100 philosophies. We then qualitatively analyzed the website texts outlining training philosophy using the text analysis software MAXQDA. Trainers were identified as using either non-aversive methods (utilizing positive reinforcement and no use of aversive leash tools) or aversive methods (may use positive reinforcement but will also utilize aversive methods to punish) by trainer self-identification or training-tool use. We gathered demographic and educational information and the stated training philosophy from the websites of 100 dog trainers from 10 US cities, identified by a popular consumer review site, to determine whether there was a difference in word use between training methodologies, if women practiced non-aversive techniques more than men, and if non-aversive trainers were more often certified than aversive trainers. To date, there has been little analysis of the words trainers use or whether specific words or phrases can readily differentiate the type of training methodology practiced. This is a small-group workshop the number of participants is limited to 15 participants are expected to attend all three sessions.Dog trainers’ word choice may provide information about how a trainer understands and relates to the dogs they work with. ![]() A free 30-day trial of MAXQDA is available (). Participants are required to bring their own laptops with MAXQDA (either MAC or WINDOWS versions) installed and running (trial version or registered version). No previous experience with MAXQDA is necessary. The user guides will also be made accessible to other users via the QDA Tools Website at the School of Education?s MERIT library at the end of the semester. The guides will focus on the methods & data used by the participants thus, the users will be able to learn the use of the functions that are most relevant to their research. ![]() The exploration of the software will be guided by a meaningful task: the participants will collaborate in creating user guides within the software MAXQDA. Through working on a small project, participants will have an immersive experience with the software and will be ready to successfully use the software in their own research projects. They will become familiar with import/export functions, annotation functions (memos/coded), and with using a variety of media in the software (video, audio, images, text, pdf etc). In this project-based workshop series, participants will learn how to use MAXQDA as a tool for organizing and analyzing qualitative data. You should plan to attend all the sessions. This workshop has sessions on multiple days.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |